For years, humans dreamed about the flying cars from “Back to the Future,” and the simulated reality from “The Matrix,” wondering if we will ever live in such a society. But as these films reveal, futuristic inventions are not flawless — they often come with unintended repercussions. With technology advancing at rapid speed, are we rushing into a future where we can no longer control its consequences?
Ray-Ban and Meta launched its collaboration product, Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses last month. Its features include artificial intelligence, cameras, microphones and open-speakers. An epitome of technological advancement, the product opens a new frontier in the realm of augmented reality.
On the other hand, these glasses have the potential to invade sensitive information and personal conversations — often without the consent of those around the wearer. In one study, two Harvard University students found that when paired with various software such as Instagram and PimEyes, the glasses could be used to “access personal information like home addresses, phone numbers and even relatives’ names” of people that appear in its vision. While the glasses include a small LED light that indicates when the camera is in use, it is not a definite protection; after all, if the light is overlooked or intentionally obscured, there is no way to prevent unauthorized surveillance. It cannot be assumed that people will ordinarily be looking around for that small light indicating they are being recorded — that is not our responsibility.
At a more profound level, the Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses echo a broader issue: The uneven pace between marketing the benefits of innovation versus regarding its potential risks.
Mary Shelley’s novel “Frankenstein,” critiques the unchecked pursuit of science and warns the dangers of obsessing over creation without acknowledging the consequences. Despite being written more than two centuries ago, the novel feels oddly similar to modern society. Much like Victor Frankenstein’s regret over creating a monster purely for scientific pursuit, today’s culture mirrors a similar mindset, lacking sufficient consideration of potential dangers or the responsibilities owed to those affected by them.
Technology has undoubtedly improved our lives. But are all inventions really driven by pure desire to improve the human experience, or just for the sake of continuing progression? It’s time we start seriously deliberating whether superfluous benefits are worth driving ourselves into more danger. We don’t need glasses with cameras and virtual assistants; what we need instead is a stop to the toxic chain of technology addiction.
